Betting on the legislative graveyard that some senators oversee, data brokers in a post-Roe country are selling and accessing lists to pregnant women confident they can get away with it even as Democrats try to warn them. The seriousness of such an act has been demonstrated in recent history.
Politico found more than 30 lists of data brokers that provide information about parents expecting or selling access to these people through mass email blasts. 25 of them were updated after the Supreme Court ruling in Roe v. Wade on June 24.”
The position of many of these data brokers appears to be legal. Who cares if it’s ethical or puts a woman’s life at risk.
Joe Beech, CEO of NextMark, said he sees no problem with hosting these lists.
“As far as I know, there is no law today that bans prenatal mailing lists. If that changes and this type of data becomes illegal, we will work with providers to remove these lists,” Beach said.
You may have heard the calls for women to delete their period app once the draft of Raw’s coup was leaked, but there are other ways the digital path can be used to sue.
Cynthia Conti-Cook conducted the research and found that this is not only possible, but has already happened and greatly affects “people of color, immigrants, low-income individuals and those
With any combination of these characteristics”:
“In addition to the history of research on the Internet, there are other types of digital media
Evidence to support a prosecution may also be excluded, including
Location tracking data, website browsing history and purchase
History, social media activity, wearable device data, data entered
Internet-connected applications and home devices.
Conti Cook, citing the 2017 case of Lattis Fisher, a Mississippi woman charged with second-degree murder after stillbirth at home. Investigators used her entire phone content, including her internet searches, telling the New York Times, “We should start with the kinds of data that have already been used to incriminate people. A text message to your sister saying ‘expletive, I’m pregnant.'” abortion or visit websites that contain information about abortion.”
In anticipation of this, Senators Elizabeth Warren (D-MASS) and Edward Markey (D-MASS) wrote a letter at the end of July sent to PoliticusUSA, raising concern that the Student Activity Monitoring Program could be used to criminalize students seeking pregnancy or abortion related information, based on To an investigation they issued in March that “a recent report by privacy experts … found that digital surveillance data could be weaponized to “target pregnant women and use their health data against them in a court of law” and internet search engines were identified as “effective tool(s).” Especially” because “the police can not only get search records from a pregnant woman’s device, but they can also get records directly from search engines.”
The largely unregulated world of the Internet continues to encourage privacy theft and the somewhat secretive sale of private information. The fact that we can’t even pass basic privacy laws reflects on the company’s strength in what appears to be the late capitalist phase of our grand experiment.
There are more important values than profit and greed, including the protection of inherent rights, including the right to privacy.
Ms. Jones is the co-founder/editor of PoliticusUSA and a member of the White House Press Caucus.
Sarah hosts Politicus News and co-hosts Politicus Radio. Her analysis has appeared on numerous national radio and TV news programs, talk shows, and print outlets including USA with David Schuster, as well as The Washington Post, Atlantic Wire, CNN, MSNBC, The Week, The Hollywood Reporter, and more. .
Sarah is a member of the Association of Professional Journalists.